Legal Opinion

Ruden v. Jenk

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-1708PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

Gertrude Ruden and Rosella Jasper filed a legal malpractice action against Tom Jenk asserting that he had breached the standard of care as their attorney regarding their property rights and potential remedies in securing those rights while handling the estate of their deceased brother. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Jenk holding that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of legal malpractice. We affirm.

I. Standard of Review.

A party moving for summary judgment has the burden of establishing the absence of any genuine issue of material…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & RothbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Engstrom v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. Schreiner v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Clinkscales v. Nelson Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Trobaugh v. SondagSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. Melissa Stender v. Anthony Zane BlessumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Robert Allen Barker v. Donald H. Capotosto and Thomas M. MageeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API