Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2016No. 061238; A153902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Following a reversal and remand for a new trial, State v. Kelly, 244 Or App 105, 260 P3d 551 (2011),1 defendant was convicted by a jury of 12 counts each of first-degree sexual abuse and first-degree sodomy against a child victim. On appeal, he assigns error to, among other things, the trial court’s admission, pursuant to OEC 803(18a)(b), of certain hearsay statements of the victim. He contends that the state, as the proponent of those hearsay statements, failed to comply with OEC 803(18a)(b)’s requirement that the proponent “make[] known to the adverse party the proponent’s intention to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. LambCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. EdblomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Zamora-ChonaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. Zamora-ChonaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API