Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 2011No. 061238; A139810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for multiple counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, and first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405. He assigns error to, among other things, the trial court’s admission of an expert’s medical diagnosis that complainant had been sexually abused. That diagnosis was rendered in the absence of any physical evidence of abuse. Consistently with State v. Lupoli, 348 Or 346, 234 P3d 117 (2010), we conclude that the trial court’s admission of that diagnosis was error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

Defendant was charged with sexually abusing and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. LupoliOregon Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. RhamyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API