Legal Opinion
State of NY v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1995No. 83-CV-1401CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, District Judge.
On July 19, 1994, third-party defendant Laidlaw Inc. (“Laidlaw”) filed a motion to dismiss, with prejudice, the amended third-party complaints of Solvent Chemical Co., Inc. (“Solvent”), Item 179, Mader Capital, Inc. (“Mader”), Item 181, and ICC Industries, Inc. (“ICC”), Item 183. Item 240. Oral argument was held on December 16, 1994. For the reasons given below, Raid-law’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, the State of New York, filed suit on December 9, 1983, against Solvent, Mad-er, ICC, and three other defendants, under the Comprehensive Environmental- Response,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Carolina Transformer Company Dewey Strother Kenneth Ray Strother Faytranco, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Lansford-Coaldale Joint Water Authority, in No. 92-7605 v. Tonolli Corporation Tonolli Canada, Ltd. Ifim International B v. in No. 92-7671Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,288 William S. Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., Inc. And Bradford Broker Settlement, Inc., N/k/a Fidata CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schiavone v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- LNC Investments, Inc. v. First Fidelity Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Idylwoods Associates v. Mader Capital, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Crews v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- New York v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.