Legal Opinion
Kirkeberg v. Canadian Pacific Railway
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2010No. 09-1422PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.
Mike Kirkeberg brought claims pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. §§ 363A.01-.41, alleging that his employer, Canadian Pacific Railway (“Canadian Pacific”), discriminated against him on the basis of his disabilities and retaliated against him for engaging in protected activity. He also brought claims alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and the Minnesota Whistleblower Act, Minn.Stat. § 181.932. The district court 1…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervening v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Yulanda Hill v. Carolyn WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- John Goodpaster v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. and Todd Swanson, Individually and in His Corporate CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- St. Martin v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.