Lipschultz v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted this petition for special action pursuant to Article 6, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 1, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S., because this is a matter of state-wide importance and there is no equal, plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal.
We must answer two questions:
1. Is information obtained by the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners in its investigation of alleged medical malpractice pursuant to statute, A.R.S. § 32-1451.01, privileged?
2. If a privilege exists, is it properly enforceable by the petitioners?
The facts necessary to a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Tucson Medical Center Incorporated v. RowlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Martin v. CaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Shepherd v. CastleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
- Grossman v. Westmoreland II InvestorsArizona Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Valley Health System, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. v. Eighth Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Sun Health Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.