Legal Opinion

Lipschultz v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1981No. 15078PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted this petition for special action pursuant to Article 6, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 1, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S., because this is a matter of state-wide importance and there is no equal, plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal.

We must answer two questions:

1. Is information obtained by the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners in its investigation of alleged medical malpractice pursuant to statute, A.R.S. § 32-1451.01, privileged?

2. If a privilege exists, is it properly enforceable by the petitioners?

The facts necessary to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Tucson Medical Center Incorporated v. RowlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Martin v. CaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Shepherd v. CastleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
  5. Grossman v. Westmoreland II InvestorsArizona Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Valley Health System, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. v. Eighth Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sun Health Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API