Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Castle

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 19, 1957No. 1217PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGE, District Judge.

Defendant in the case at bar served notice on plaintiff, under Rule 26(a), Federal Rules Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A., to take the deposition of one A. S. Ludwig, Claims Adjuster for Hardware Mutual Casualty Company. Said insurance company is presently paying plaintiff Workmen’s Compensation benefits under the laws of the State of Missouri because of injuries received by plaintiff in the automobile casualty, the subject matter of the instant action. In connection with the above deposition notice, defendant caused subpoena duces tecum to be issued to Ludwig, under Rule…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Demoulin v. RoetheliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. McNelley v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
  5. Pritt v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. BraddickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  3. Cooney v. Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Burton Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. ForemanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
  5. Hunt International Resources Corp. v. BinsteinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API