Legal Opinion

Wade v. Mahler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 2000No. 9702-01218; CA A103268PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s entry of a money judgment in favor of defendant. That judgment reduced the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff by the amount of her settlement with a third party and by reason of a personal injury protection (PIP) reimbursement, thereby reducing plaintiffs damages award to zero. The judgment designated defendant as the prevailing party and awarded defendant costs in the amount of $1,000.50. Plaintiff assigns three errors, arguing that the setoff of her award by the third-party settlement and. PIP reimbursement was not proper and that, in any event, defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. York v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Mitchell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. AutoLend, IAP, Inc. v. Auto Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Delcastillo v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Hughes v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API