Wade v. Mahler
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s entry of a money judgment in favor of defendant. That judgment reduced the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff by the amount of her settlement with a third party and by reason of a personal injury protection (PIP) reimbursement, thereby reducing plaintiffs damages award to zero. The judgment designated defendant as the prevailing party and awarded defendant costs in the amount of $1,000.50. Plaintiff assigns three errors, arguing that the setoff of her award by the third-party settlement and. PIP reimbursement was not proper and that, in any event, defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- York v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Mitchell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- AutoLend, IAP, Inc. v. Auto Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Delcastillo v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Hughes v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.