Legal Opinion

Runft v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 1986No. WCB 83-03962; CA A34302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s order holding that SAIF, as insurer for Specialized Service, is not responsible for claimant’s asbestosis.

Claimant worked for Specialized Service as a mechanic for seven years, from 1959 to January, 1966, fabricating brake linings for trucks, automobiles and industrial machinery. The work produced great clouds of asbestos dust. Claimant worked in a small room, without ventilation or respiratory protection. Later he worked as a brake mechanic for four years at International Harvester, where he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Holden v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. FMC Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. FMC Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Runft v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Progress Quarries v. VaanderingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API