Legal Opinion

United States v. Elizondo

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 24, 2002No. L-00-937-11PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ELLISON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Cesar Elizondo’s Supplemental Motion for New Trial. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion 1 is GRANTED.

I. Facts and Procedural History

After a five-day jury trial, Defendant was convicted of one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to distribute, a quantity in excess of ten kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

The charges against Defendant arose from a large-scale investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration that led to cocaine seizures in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SMILENew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph LiebschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph LiebschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. SMILENew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API