Legal Opinion
State v. SMILE
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 2009No. 27,338PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals from his conviction for aggravated stalking in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-3A-3.1 (1997). Defendant argues that his conduct was insufficient to support a charge of aggravated stalking, that testimony regarding statements he made to the police prior to and after his arrest should have been suppressed because he was not read his Miranda rights, and that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence that Defendant had attempted to plead guilty at his first appearance. For the following reasons, we affirm Defendant’s conviction.
I. BACKGROUND
{2}…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. TsosieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. DuttleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. OlivasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Holguin v. SALLY BEAUTY SUPPLY INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.