Legal Opinion
Monaco v. Fuddruckers, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 17, 1992No. 89 C 9031PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Ralph Monaco brings this action against defendant Fuddruckers, Inc., under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (ADEA). Before us now is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons below, we grant defendant’s motion.
I. FACTS 1
Monaco was 38 years old when he started working at Fuddruckers in defendant’s Matteson, Illinois restaurant on July 9, 1985. He was an hourly employee and worked as a butcher. He also periodically assisted as a butcher-trainer during the openings of other Fuddruckers…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ralph MONACO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FUDDRUCKERS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Gold Star Taxi & Transportation Service v. Mall of America Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997