United States v. Holt
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
Mil.R.Evid. 404(b) states:
Rule 404. Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes
******(b) Other crimes, wrongs, or acts. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.
The application of this provision is the basis of the appellant’s appeal. In concluding…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Carl BenedettoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. John W. Sliker, John Carbone, and Theodore Buchwald, A/K/A "Bucky," DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. BrannanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- State v. McClellanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. McCallisterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. HonicanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. RaichleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. BrodinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. EdmondU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.