Legal Opinion

Gillen v. Bayfield

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 11, 1932PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages for breach of an alleged contract to sell plaintiff a 40 per cent interest in a hotel corporation and employ him as manager.

Defendant, on January 9, 1925, entered into a written contract to purchase for $230,000 from the owner, Mr. Sodini, all the capital stock of the Majestic Hotel Company, which operated a hotel in St. Louis. Defendant paid $5,000 in cash on the purchase price, and was required by the contract to pay $100,000 in cash on February 1st, and give notes totalling $125,000, payable $1500 per month for the balance. February 1st came on Sunday and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Huttig v. BrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Cazzell v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Heigold v. United Railways CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Hudson v. BrowningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shofler v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Suhre v. BuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Laclede Gas Company, Doing Business as Midwest Missouri Gas Company v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Coffman Industries, Inc. v. Gorman-Taber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Aden v. DaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API