Legal Opinion

Pesek v. Univ. Neurologists Assn., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2000No. 1998-0238PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 495.] PESEK, APPELLANT, ET AL. v. UNIVERSITY NEUROLOGISTS ASSOCIATION, INC. ET AL.; KLEIN ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Pesek v. Univ. Neurologists Assn., Inc.,

2000-Ohio-483.] Physicians—Torts—Medical malpractice—Jury instructions—“Different methods” charge to jury appropriate, when. In medical malpractice cases, the “different methods” charge to the jury is appropriate only if there is evidence that more than one method of diagnosis or treatment is acceptable for a particular medical condition. (No. 98-238—Submitted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital WestOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Riley v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harris v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Di v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Wynn v. Gilbert, C-060457 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Lowder v. DomingoOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API