Legal Opinion

Smith v. Galley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1990No. 88-7096PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

William Smith prosecutes his appeal from two adverse orders of the district court in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because Smith did not properly perfect his appeal, we are without jurisdiction to consider the orders in question and we therefore dismiss the appeal.

William Smith, an inmate at the Maryland State Penitentiary, suffers from a psychogenic pain disorder that, although psychological in nature, causes him severe pain and prevents him from walking. After two prison psychologists decided to deny Smith the use of a wheelchair, Smith brought this action, pro…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Walter J. Cobb, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Smith v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Smith v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Smith v. GalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API