Smith v. Barry
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, District Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant William Smith prosecutes this appeal from two adverse orders of the district court. As to defendant-ap-pellee Barry, we find that Smith failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as to Dr. Barry. As to defendants-appellees Victor, Turner, Hall, Brown, Jackson, and Wilkins (“the six prison guards”), we find that Smith did perfect his appeal, but affirm the district court’s direction of a verdict and entry of judgment in their favor on Smith’s deliberate indifference claim.1
*182I.
William Smith suffers from a painful psychogenic…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. HenaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Daniel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Barbara A. Koch, Individually James P. Koch, as Husband and Wife v. Sports Health Home Care Corporation, D/B/A MediCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Smith v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Baltas v. CookDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.