Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barry

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1993No. 88-7096PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, District Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant William Smith prosecutes this appeal from two adverse orders of the district court. As to defendant-ap-pellee Barry, we find that Smith failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as to Dr. Barry. As to defendants-appellees Victor, Turner, Hall, Brown, Jackson, and Wilkins (“the six prison guards”), we find that Smith did perfect his appeal, but affirm the district court’s direction of a verdict and entry of judgment in their favor on Smith’s deliberate indifference claim.1

*182I.

William Smith suffers from a painful psychogenic…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. HenaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Daniel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. Barbara A. Koch, Individually James P. Koch, as Husband and Wife v. Sports Health Home Care Corporation, D/B/A MediCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Smith v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Baltas v. CookDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API