Legal Opinion
Gray v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 5, 2001No. Civ.A. H-98-2211PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WERLEIN, District Judge.
Pending is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 25). After carefully considering the motion, response, reply, summary judgment evidence, and applicable law, the Court concludes that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Document No. 25) should be granted.
I. Background
Defendant Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. (“Sears”) has employed Plaintiff Don Gray (“Gray”) for over thirty years. Gray has diabetes and, on two occasions over the past seven years, Gray’s diabetes required him to take medical leaves of absence. Alleging that Sears…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sepulveda v. GlickmanDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001
- Georgen-Saad v. Texas Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2002
- Fraser v. United States BancorpDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Roberson v. Game Stop, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Shawn Cooper v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.