Legal Opinion
In Re Alfred J. Vincent
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 4, 1997No. 96-508PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner Dr. Alfred J. Vincent has now appeared before this court twenty times, repeatedly asking us to revisit litigation that was finally decided on the merits years ago. Most recently, Vincent filed a petition for a writ mandamus, which we denied. In Re Vincent, 86 F.3d 1154 (4th Cir.1996). On May 16, 1996, we ordered Vincent to show cause as to why we should not sanction him for filing this mandamus petition. Today, having reviewed his response, we impose sanctions on Vincent, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38, for filing this mandamus petition, which we find to…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Whitaker v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shieh v. KakitaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Attwood v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bast v. Cohen, Dunn & Sinclair, PCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- Denardo v. CutlerAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Mitrano v. WarshellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Anderson v. The State of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Bast v. GlasbergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Baxter v. Nissan of ShelbyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.