Legal Opinion
Stanko v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 5, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2010-0708Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAY - 5 2010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Rudy Stanko, ) Courts for the District of Columbia ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 10 (flUb Eric Holder, Attorney General, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the "Petition for a Declaratory Judgment, or in Alternative, a Petition for the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus" and the petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the case…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anthony Ojo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Taylor v. United States Board of Parole. Taylor v. McGrath Attorney General of United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Anthony J. Lobue v. Warren Christopher, Secretary, U.S. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Rudolph George StankoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. StankoDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2009