Legal Opinion
Taylor v. United States Board of Parole. Taylor v. McGrath Attorney General of United States (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 7, 1952No. 11108, 11109, 11153PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Per curiam
Motions have been made in behalf of appellees (defendants below) to affirm the judgments below upon the ground that each appeal is without merit. The attorney as signed by this court to represent appellant, a prisoner confined in the Medical Center for .Federal Prisoners at Springfield, Missouri, also advises the court to like effect.
In 11108 the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. See opinion of this court in McCann v. Clark, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. -, 191 F.2d 476. Moreover, as the complaint apparently seeks a declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Martin v. HiattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- McCann v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- McaFfee v. ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Hill v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
- Pradelski v. Hawk-SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Maldonado-Torres v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Goodwin v. HammockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Davis v. United States Sentencing CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.