Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanko

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 23, 2009No. 8:05CR93PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Chief Judge.

Before the court is defendant Rudy Stanko’s (“Stanko”) motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Filing No. 335. Stanko has a number of related motions which, with the exception of Filing Nos. 383 and 384, are tied to his request to vacate. These related filings include the following motions: motion to expedite, Filing No. 341; motion for prompt examination, Filing No. 346; motion to arrest judgment, Filing No. 349; motion petition/demand for information, Filing No. 352; motion for release, Filing No. 357; motion to reduce sentence,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Holland v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stanko v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API