Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MacKey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1918No. 8347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County ; John Caruthers, Judge. Action between the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company and B. IV. Mack-ey, County Treasurer of Hughes County, and another. Judgment for the latter, and the former brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This ease is properly before the court, petition in error and case-made having been filed on May 26, 1916. Plaintiff in error, complying with the rules of the court, has served and filed its brief, which appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, but defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered excuse for such failure. TJie general.rule in such case is:

“Where plaintiff in error has completed his record and filed it in this court and has served and filed a brief, in compliance ’with, the rules of this court,' and the defendant in error has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Purcell Bridge & Transfer Co. v. HineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lusk v. HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Pierce v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API