Legal Opinion
Hicks Rubber Co. v. Columbia Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 18, 1923No. 6562PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The Hicks Rubber Company, a copartnership composed of D. N. Hicks, E. A. Hicks, and D. T. Hicks instituted this suit against the Columbia Tire & Rubber Company, a corporation incorporated under the the laws of the state of Ohio, with P. A. Doyle, of Dallas county, Tex;, as its agent, to recover 10 per cent, commission on a $19,000 sale of automobile casings and tubes made by appellee to the Cooper Grocery Company of Waco, Tex.
Appellant alleged that appellee had agreed to pay a commission on such sale. Appellee answered by a general demurrer and special exceptions, and general denial, and by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Tompkins MacHinery & Implement Co. v. Peter & SherrillTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Henderson Mercantile Co. v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. SublettTexas Supreme Court · 1866
- Overton v. First Texas State Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dallas Nat. Bank v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Kramer v. Grand National Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- National Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Patton v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936