Legal Opinion

Tompkins MacHinery & Implement Co. v. Peter & Sherrill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1892No. 7298PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge,

Section A. — Suit by the Tompkins Machinery and Implement Company, a private corporation, against Peter & Sherrill partners in a mercantile and farm machinery business at Roanoke, Texas, for the alleged value of five pulverizers shipped by plaintiff from Dallas to them, and freight on five pulverizers. The suit was predicated on a written contract, as follows:

“Roanoke P. O., Texas, July 31, 1885.

uTo Tompkins Machinery and Implement Company, Dallas, Texas:

“You will please order for us, to be delivered on cars at Dallas as per our order, ten No. 2 Chicago Screw Pulverizers and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McAlpin v. CassidyTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Robson v. Watts' heirsTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. McAlpin v. ZillerTexas Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Green v. PriddyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Wichita Frozen Food Lockers, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Cannel Coal Co. v. LunaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API