Huff v. Trent Academy of Basic Education Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
We hold it was error to grant the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. In the light most favorable to the plaintiffs the evidence shows that James Huff embezzled $59,947.50 from the Bank and deposited the money in the account of the Academy. Although the Academy might have been an innocent party to the transaction, it was unjustly enriched at the expense of the Bank, and it would be inequitable to allow it to retain these funds. See American Surety Co. v. Baker, 172 F. 2d 689 (4th Cir. 1949); Allgood v. Trust Co., 242 N.C. 506, 88 S.E. 2d 825 (1955); Cheek v. Squires, 200…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad v. Atlantic & North Carolina Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Allgood v. Wilmington Savings & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Peoples National Bank v. WaggonerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- STANDARD AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abbott v. Blackwelder Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1983
- Anderson v. Brokers, Inc. (In Re Brokers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008