Almquist v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hutchison, J.:
The principal question involved in this appeal is whether the nonclaim provision of section 5 of chapter 88 of the Laws of 1927, reducing the time for depositors and creditors to file their claim with the receiver of an insolvent state bank to one year after the appointment of the receiver, applies to claims against a bank in the hands of the receiver prior to the time the new law became effective.
The two claims of the plaintiff in this case, one a certificate of deposit and the other a dishonored draft, were presented to the receiver for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Milbourne v. KelleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Keith v. KeithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Serrault v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Bank Savings Life Insurance v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reed v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- State ex rel. Boynton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- International Mortgage Trust Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Palmer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Davis' Administrator v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.