Legal Opinion

Bank Savings Life Insurance v. Baker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1926No. 26,876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action in mandamus and under the declaratory judgment act. The point in controversy is whether the amended law relating to notice of forfeiture of life insurance policies applies to policies issued prior to its passage. The statute was originally enacted in 1913 (ch. 212), was amended in a particular not here important in 1923 (R. S. 40-332, 40-333), and substantially amended by chapter 184 of the Laws of 1925. As here printed *757the words in brackets were in the statute of 1913; those in italics were not. The amended statute omitted…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Knights Templars' & Masons' Life Indemnity Co. v. JarmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Thompson v. . Postal Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Warren Gee Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Southland Life Ins. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Knights Templars' & Masons' Life Indemnity Co. v. JarmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nitchals v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Ellis v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Sebal v. Columbian National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Almquist v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Wegner v. Federal Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API