Legal Opinion

Sindelar v. Hanel Oil, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1998No. S-95-1296PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Hanel Oil, Inc. (Hanel), moved for summary judgment on the basis that the action filed by Glenn Sindelar, as trustee of Silver Creek Farms; Glenn Sindelar; Melvin Sindelar; and Lois Sindelar (the appellants) was time barred. Following a hearing, the district court granted Hand’s motion for summary judgment. However, no record was made of the hearing on this motion. On appeal, relying on Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 5A(1) (rev. 1996), the Nebraska Court of Appeals found that the failure to make a verbatim record prevented the Court of Appeals from reviewing the district court’s ruling on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Ackeren v. NEBRASKA BOARD OF PAROLENebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ackles v. LuttrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Vilas v. SteavensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Allphin v. WardNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Gerdes v. Klindt's, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reisig v. Allstate InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. ProData Computer Services, Inc. v. PonecNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Morrison Enterprises v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. KanarickNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Durkan v. VaughanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API