Legal Opinion

Durkan v. Vaughan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2000No. S-99-216PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Russell Joseph Durkan, filed a second amended petition alleging that the appellees, Joseph G. Vaughan and LeeAnn A. Vaughan, were negligent in failing to supervise the conduct of their adult son who allegedly assaulted Durkan. Durkan alleged that the Vaughans had knowledge of prior assaultive behavior on the part of their son. The Vaughans moved for summary judgment. At the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, Durkan offered an exhibit indicating that the Vaughans were aware of a prior instance of assault by their son. The record is silent regarding whether the exhibit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Ackeren v. NEBRASKA BOARD OF PAROLENebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. DeCosta Sporting Goods, Inc. v. KirklandNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dairyland Power Cooperative v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sindelar v. Hanel Oil, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Derr v. Columbus Convention Center, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herrera v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cerny v. LongleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. J.B. Contracting Services, Inc. v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Morrison Enterprises v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Pierce v. Landmark Mgmt. GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API