Legal Opinion

Schvaneveldt v. Clegg

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1929No. 4779PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This is a motion to strike the bill of exceptions on the ground that it was not served or filed in time. The action is one to quiet title to land in the plaintiff. There is a denial and a counterclaim to quiet the title in the defendant. The case was tried to the court. The trial began November 2, 1927. On a submission of the case, and prior to preparing, signing, and filing findings and a decree, the court orally indicated that his findings and judgment would be in favor of the plaintiff quieting the title in him. At about that time, and on November 4, 1927, the court, on the defendant’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jennings v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Warnock Insurance Agency v. Peterson Real Estate Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnard v. HardyUtah Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API