Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Dart Container Corp. of Michigan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 17, 2001No. 94-10758-RCLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ON CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIMS
LINDSAY, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action in which the plaintiff, John A. Bailey (“Bailey”), alleges that the defendants, Dart Container Corporation of Michigan, Dart Container Corporation, Dart Container Corporation of Pennsylvania, and Dart Container Corporation of Kentucky (collectively “Dart”), infringed Bailey’s United States patents numbered 4,322,015 (“the ’015 patent”) and 4,473,167 (“the ’167 patent”). Before a fact-finder can determine whether there has been infringement, I must first construe all of the patent claims to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barreca v. South Beach Beverage Co., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Gentile v. Franklin Sports, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Metrologic Instruments, Inc. v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006