Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Devino
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 2001No. 3:99-cv-00555PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On March 25, 1999, plaintiff Donald Schmidt [“Schmidt”] commenced this action against defendants Kenneth Devino [“Devino”] and Devino Fuels, Inc. [“Devino Fuels”] for an alleged wiretapping of plaintiffs workplace telephone. The complaint asserts four claims: violation of the Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. (First Cause of Action), violation of Conn.GeN.Stat. § 54-41r (Second Cause of Action), fraudulent concealment (Fourth Cause of Action), 1 and invasion of privacy (Fifth Cause of Action). On August…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jacobson v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, at & T Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Deal v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- In Re State Police LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Louie E. Nalley v. Patsy D. Nalley, Joyce F. Blanton v. Patsy D. NalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DirecTV, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- DIRECTV, INC. v. BatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. ArnoldDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Directv, Inc. v. GollyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005