Legal Opinion

Michigan Central Railroad v. Saginaw Milling Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 16, Calendar No. 38,154PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Three cars of milled oats were shipped from Michigan to various points in Virginia under uniform bills of lading, on each of which defendant, as shipper, signed the non-recourse clause. This clause provides that the carrier shall not make delivery without payment of freight and all other lawful charges. In each instance the bill of lading named a notify party upon whom a draft was drawn. The shipments were all received and the drafts and freight charges paid in the amounts billed by the carrier. After delivery plaintiff discovered that the rates quoted and billed were inadvertently lower than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. MarcellettiMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. BloomgardenMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. King v. Van SlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. E. Bernier & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Illinois Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. City of New Orleans v. C. B. Fox Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API