Legal Opinion

Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 31, 2001No. CV-96-5658 (CPS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

SIFTON, Senior District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, Rosco, Inc. (“Rosco”), against defendant Mirror Lite Company (“Mirror Lite”), asserting claims of design patent infringement, trade dress infringement, false designation of origin, false description, tortious interference with business relations, and trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), as well as a claim of patent invalidity. In addition to damages, plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. Mirror Lite has asserted a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cross-Appellant v. mcneil-p.p.c., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Gerffert Co. v. DeanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. Sulfur-Tech Water Systems, Inc. v. KohlenbergDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API