Gerffert Co. v. Dean
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
PAMELA K. CHEN, District Judge.
[[Image here]]
*204The main question raised by Defendants’ summary judgment motion is: were The Gerffert Company, Inc.’s catalogs2 for religious products, featuring the iconic artwork of Fratelli Bonella,3 protectable trade dress infringed upon by William J. Hirten Co., LLC’s catalogs4 for the same product line? Because the Court answers this question in the negative, it grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs’ federal Lanham Act claim, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their state-law claims.5
I. Background6
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C.M.B. Productions, Inc. v. KaismanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- EBIN New York, Inc. v. SIC Enterprise, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023