Bayfront Medical Center v. Harding
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WENTWORTH, Senior Judge.
The Employer/Servicing Agent seek review of the judge of compensation claims’ order awarding Claimant benefits for an accident that occurred on January 7, 1993. The E/SA defended on the basis of section 440.092(3), Florida Statutes (1991), asserting that the accident occurred dining a deviation from Claimant’s employment, and was therefore not compensable. The judge found the claim to be compensable by applying the personal comfort doctrine, and ruled that the doctrine had not been abrogated by section 440.092(3). We affirm.
Competent and substantial evidence supports…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc. v. KriderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Toyota of Pensacola v. MainesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lanham v. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Sentry Insurance Co. v. HamlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Galaida v. Autozone, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019