Legal Opinion

Galaida v. Autozone, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 2004No. 1D03-2097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Nortwick, J.

Thomas Galaida challenges a final worker’s compensation order which denied entirely his claim for medical and indemnity benefits. The Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denied the claim on the finding that Galaida substantially deviated from employment at the time of his accident. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the denial of the claim.

While Galaida was working at an auto parts store, he walked outside to his car which was parked in the store parking lot for the purpose of obtaining a cigarette. As he opened the car door, a loaded firearm fell to the ground and discharged. Galaida was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mack v. Post ExchangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc. v. KriderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. B & B Cash Grocery Stores v. WortmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Bayfront Medical Center v. HardingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Dukes v. Rural Metro Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sentry Insurance Co. v. HamlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API