Webster v. Ebright
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
Civil Code section 2100 provides that “A carrier of persons for reward must use the utmost care and diligence for their safe carriage, must provide everything necessary for that purpose, and must exercise to that end a reasonable degree of skill.” The question on appeal is whether the heightened standard of care under this statute applies to all carriers for reward or only to common carriers for reward. Because Civil Code section 2100 codified the common law governing common carriers, we conclude that this statute applies only to carriers of persons for reward who are common…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- State of California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. TexacoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Shannon v. Central-Gaither Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chubb Group of Insurance v. H.A. Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Van Maanen v. Youth With a Mission-BishopDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Wright v. Midwest Old Settlers & Threshers Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.