(HC) Contreras v. People of the State of California

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODOLFO A. CONTRERAS, No. 1:19-cv-01785-NONE-JLT (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTIONS TO AMEND AND MOTION TO 13 v. STAY 14 J. W. SULLIVAN, Warden, (Docs. 23, 25, 32) 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner moves to amend and stay proceedings due to alleged newly discovered 18 evidence. The Court agrees with Respondent that the petition is untimely, and the Court finds that 19 a stay and amendment would be futile. Thurs, the motions are DENIED. 20 BACKGROUND 21 On July 28, 2020, the Court issued…