Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc. v. McNeil Real Estate Fund VI, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 23, 1993No. 91-8032Published

1DissentTjoflat, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent from the court’s decision to deny the petition for rehearing en banc for the following two reasons. First, as I discuss in part II, this case presents the issue of whether the Fifth Amendment’s Just Compensation Clause is self-executing. The panel, by proceeding as if the clause is not self-executing, has established a rule with far-reaching implications. According to the panel — and apparently now a settled matter in this circuit — state and federal statutes that operate to take private property but which do not explicitly provide for just compensation *1072are…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API