Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Ray Pelling & B. A. Railton Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 12, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,546PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Sam Caruso, a minor, by Malia Caruso, his mother and next friend, brought an action against Bay Pelling and B. A. Bailton Co., a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by the minor, Sam Caruso. The case was settled by the payment of $1,500. Charles G-. Palmer, a practicing lawyer of Chicago, who had been retained to prosecute the personal injury claim and who was later supplanted by other counsel, filed his petition claiming a lien under the Attorney’s Lien Act, Cahill’s 1931 Statutes, page 157. There was a hearing on the petition and answer, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Sutton v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Case v. Emerson-Brantingham Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Tulka v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Zazove v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Goldberg v. PerlmutterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. Mason v. PapadopulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Yellen v. J. Bloom & Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. McCallum v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API