Caruso v. Ray Pelling & B. A. Railton Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Sam Caruso, a minor, by Malia Caruso, his mother and next friend, brought an action against Bay Pelling and B. A. Bailton Co., a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by the minor, Sam Caruso. The case was settled by the payment of $1,500. Charles G-. Palmer, a practicing lawyer of Chicago, who had been retained to prosecute the personal injury claim and who was later supplanted by other counsel, filed his petition claiming a lien under the Attorney’s Lien Act, Cahill’s 1931 Statutes, page 157. There was a hearing on the petition and answer, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Sutton v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Case v. Emerson-Brantingham Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Tulka v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Zazove v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Goldberg v. PerlmutterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Mason v. PapadopulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
- Yellen v. J. Bloom & Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- McCallum v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.