Legal Opinion

Tulka v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 1, 1930No. Gen. No. 34,221PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice MoSurely

This writ of error brings in review proceedings in the circuit court, in which an order was entered awarding Marshall E. Gallion, an attorney at law, a lien to the amount of $500 for attorney’s fees under section 13, ch. 13, Illinois statutes, Cahill’s St. ch. 13, ff 13.

There is no bill of exceptions, so we shall ignore what is said in the respective briefs about matters outside of the record before us.

May 13, 1927, a declaration was filed on behalf of John Tulka, by attorneys Reuben J. Feldman and S. H. Solomon, against the defendants, Street Railway companies, claiming damages from an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standidge v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Sutton v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Goldberg v. PerlmutterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. Caruso v. Ray Pelling & B. A. Railton Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  4. Mason v. PapadopulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  5. McArdle v. Great American Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API