Legal Opinion

(1996)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided May 22, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Delegate Getty:

You have requested our opinion on two issues related to electronic mail ("e-mail") communications among members of a public body. Your specific questions are as follows:

1. Does the Maryland Open Meetings Act prohibit e-mail communications among a quorum of members of a public body?

2. Does the Maryland Public Information Act apply to e-mail communications?

Our opinion is as follows:

1. The Open Meetings Act does not apply to e-mail communications among members of a public body, unless a quorum of a public body is engaged in a simultaneous exchange of e-mail on a matter of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Executive Office of the PresidentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. Pacific Legal Foundation v. The Council on Environmental Quality, Pacific Legal Foundation v. The Council on Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Heiskell v. Mayor & City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. T.S.C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
  5. City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API