Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 13, 1993No. Nos. 93-5002, 93-5048, 93-5156 and 93-5177PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.1
2Per curiam
This consolidated appeal presents us with important questions of federal agencies’ statutory obligations to manage electronic records as well as issues related to the appropriate use of the civil contempt power to coerce conformity with district court orders.
In the flagship portion of the appeal, defendants-appellants — the Executive Office of the President (“EOP”), the Office of Administration, the National Security Council (“NSC”), the White House Communications Agency, and Trudy Peterson, Acting Archivist of the United States' — challenge the…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marc Truitt v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by63 opinions
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Broderick, Catherine v. Donaldson, WilliamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- In Re Bruce R. Lindsey (Grand Jury Testimony)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Scott Armstrong, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Executive Office of the President, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.