Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Trascher
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 2, 2001No. 00-3182PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEDEMEYER, PJ.
¶ 1. Barbara Trascher appeals from a judgment entered following a court trial *726dismissing Suzanne Schultz's claims for adverse possession and prescriptive easement, but concluding that the fence Trascher erected on her own property constituted a private nuisance. The trial court concluded that the placement of the fence unreasonably impaired Schultz's use and enjoyment of her garage. The trial court ordered Trascher to remove part of the fence she had erected. The trial court also ordered Schultz to pay costs associated with removal of the fence, but found that Schultz was the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Prince v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DeetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roundy's Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Suchomel v. University of Wisconsin Hospital & ClinicsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Apple Hill Farms Development, LLP v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- SJ Properties Suites v. Specialty Finance Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Borowski v. Weinhold (Weinhold)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.