Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The issue is whether claimant is barred from compensation by failure to file his claim within the 30-day period provided by ORS 656.265.

Claimant, a 40-year-old married male, resides in Lafayette, Oregon. A truck driver by occupation, he was employed in May 1967 by a Boise, Idaho, corporation to haul house traders to various points within the states of Oregon, Idaho, Nevada and Washington. On November 3, 1967, he injured his back whde engaged in picking up a house trader for his employer near Randle, Washington. He did not seek medical assistance until…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Satterfield v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Summit v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Bebout v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Vandre v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Widener v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Riddel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API