Legal Opinion
Riddel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 16, 1972No. 369-298PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
In this workmen’s compensation appeal the hearing officer, Workmen’s Compensation Board and the circuit court all found that the claimant’s failure to file his claim for compensation for injury within the statutory period provided by ORS 656.265(1),① did not bar his claim, because he came within the good cause exception, ORS 656.265(4)(c). That statute reads:
“(4) Failure to give notice as required by this section bars a claim under OES 656.001 to 656.794 unless:
“(c) The notice is given within one year after the date of the accident and the workman or his beneficiaries establish in a hearing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wilson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Kuralt v. SAIF Corp. (In re Kuralt)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018