Legal Opinion

Paul v. Barnbrook

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1914No. 8,425PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Wabash. Circuit Court; A. S. Plummer, Judge. Action by Frank G. Barnbrook and others against William S. Paul and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, this appeal is prosecuted.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, C. J.

On September 4, 1905, appellees filed their verified complaint in the Huntington Circuit Court against appellants, William S. Paul and Charles Poorman, and the Citizens State Bank, asking that Paul and Poorman be restrained from selling or transferring certain promissory notes executed by appellees to Paul and Poorman, until notice of a hearing on the application for a restraining order could be given, and that upon such hearing a temporary injunction be issued and that upon final trial the notes be ordered cancelled.

*609The averments of the complaint as far as material to the questions presented…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McBurnie v. SeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Nickless v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Adair v. MergentheimIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Rice v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Dygert v. DygertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burrell v. JeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pace v. Peter Couture & Southern Express Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Schofield v. RideoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hedges v. MehringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Unger v. McManusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API