Legal Opinion

Dygert v. Dygert

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1892No. 425PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.

This action is by the appellee against the appellant. The complaint is in two paragraphs, the first of which is upon an account to recover $500 for a one-half interest in a tile mill alleged to have been sold by the appellee to the appellant.

*277The second paragraph of the complaint, stripped of a superabundance of words, avers that in 1887 the appellee sold to the appellant a one-half interest in a certain tile mill and its business, in consideration of the payment by the appellant of $500 and the performance of other engagements to wit: The appellant was to personally manage said business and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Bell v. . MerrifieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Lewis v. Ocean Navigation & Pier Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. McBurnie v. SeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Town of Flora v. Indiana Service Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Kleinschmidt v. BinzelMontana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Schofield v. RideoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Fulton v. GesterdingSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API